Interpersonal relations of spouses with different types of psychological boundaries

PII

S020595920012580-4-1

DOI

10.31857/S020595920012580-4

Publication Type

Article

Status

Published

Authors

Y. Volobuev
T. Levy

Occupation: Professor, Department of General Psychology and History of Psychology
Affiliation: Moscow University for the Humanities
Address: ul.Yunosti, 5/1

Tatiana N. Savchenko

Occupation: Leading Researcher
Affiliation: Institute of Psychology of Russian Academy of Sciences
Address: Russian Federation, Moscow

Volume/ Edition

Volume 41 / Issue number 6

Pages

14-25

Abstract

The work is devoted to the study of the role of the psychological boundaries of spouses in their interpersonal relationships. The theoretical basis of the work was the author's approach of T.S. Levy, in which the psychological border is considered as a functional organ of the personality. The study involved 46 married couples (92 people), married in a marriage of 5 years. The methods used were: “The psychological border of the personality” Levi T.S., “Questionnaire of satisfaction with marriage” V.V. Stolin, T.L. Romanova, G.P. Butenko, “Features of communication between spouses”Yu.E. Aleshina, L.Ya. Gozman, E.M. Dubovskoy, “Typical family state” E.G. Eidemiller, V. Yustitsky. In accordance with expectations, it was proved that the better the psychological boundaries of spouses are formed, the more positive their interpersonal relations, the higher the level of satisfaction with marriage. The specificity of the relationship between the level of satisfaction with marriage and psychological boundaries in men and women is revealed. The types of psychological boundaries of respondents are revealed. The features of the relationship of spouses with a different combination of types of psychological boundaries in a pair are proved and described.

Keywords

Interpersonal relations of spouses, satisfaction with marriage, psychological border of a person, type of psychological border, functional organ

Date of publication

21.11.2019

Date of Year of publication

2019

Number of purchasers

Views

1219

References

Reference

1. Aleshina YU.E. Udovletvorennost' brakom i mezhlichnostnoe vospriyatie v supruzheskih parah s razlichnym stazhem semejnoj zhizni: Avtoref. dis. ... kand. psihol. nauk. Moscow, 1985. (In Russian)
2. Ammon G. Psihosomaticheskaya terapiya. St. Petersburg: Rech', 2000. (In Russian)
3. Bouen M. Teoriya semejnyh sistem Myurreya Bouena: Osnovnye ponyatiya, metody i klinicheskaya praktika. Moscow: Kogito-Centr, 2015. (In Russian)
4. Bern SH.M. Gendernaya psihologiya. St. Petersburg: Prajm-EVROZNAK, 2002. (In Russian)
5. Varga A.YA. Vvedenie v sistemnuyu simejnuyu psihoterapiyu. Moscow: Kogito-centr, 2009. (In Russian)
6. Zinchenko V.P. Funkcional'nyj organ. Bol'shoj psihologicheskij slovar'. Sost. i obshch. red. (In Russian)B.G. Meshcheryakov, V.P. Zinchenko. St. Petersburg: Prajm-EVROZNAK, 2007.
7. Zinchenko V.P. Aleksej Alekseevich Uhtomskij i psihologiya (K 125-letiyu so dnya rozhdeniya). Voprosy psihologii. 2000. №4. P. 79–97. (In Russian)
8. Il'in E.P. Differencial'naya psihofiziologiya muzhchin i zhenshchin. St. Petersburg: Piter, 2003. (In Russian)
9. Kon I.M. Muzhchina v menyayushchemsya mire. Moscow: Vremya, 2009. (In Russian)
10. Kurbatkina YU.V. Psihologicheskaya distanciya v brake: Avtoref. dis. ... kand. psihol. nauk. Moscow, 2006. (In Russian)
11. Levi T.S. Prostranstvenno-telesnaya model' razvitiya lichnosti. Psikhologicheskii zhurnal. 2008. T. 29. № 1. P. 23–33. (In Russian)
12. Levi T.S. Dinamika psihologicheskih granic v processe lichnostno-razvivayushchej raboty, osnovannoj na telesnom dvizhenii. Kul'turno-istoricheskaya psihologiya. 2009. № 1. P. 36–41. (In Russian)
13. Levi T.S. Telesnaya paradigma razvitiya lichnostnoj autentichnosti. Moscow: Izdatel'stvo MosGU, 2011. (In Russian)
14. Levi T.S. Metodika diagnostiki psihologicheskoj granicy lichnosti. Voprosy psihologii. 2013. № 1. P. 131–146. (In Russian)
15. Levi T.S. Diagnostika psihologicheskoj granicy lichnosti: kachestvennyj analiz. Voprosy psihologii. 2013. № 5. P. 131–146. (In Russian)
16. Levi T.S. Telesno-energijnyj podhod k ponimaniyu psihologicheskoj granicy cheloveka. Nauchnye trudy Moskovskogo gumanitarnogo universiteta, 2017, №2, № 2. URL: http://journals.mosgu.ru/trudy/article/view/448 (data obrashcheniya: 09.08.2020). (In Russian)
17. Levin K. Teoriya polya v social'nyh naukah. St. Petersburg: Rech', 2000. (In Russian)
18. Nartova-Bochaver S.K. CHelovek suverennyj. St. Petersburg: Piter, 2008. (In Russian)
19. Nartova-Bochaver S.K., Bochaver K.A., Bochaver S.YU. ZHiznennoe prostranstvo sem'i: ob"edinenie i razdelenie. Moscow: Genezis, 2011. (In Russian)
20. Padun M.A. Regulyaciya emocij: process, formy, mekhanizmy. Psikhologicheskii zhurnal. 2010. V. 31. № 6. P. 57–69. (In Russian)
21. Padun M.A. Regulyaciya emocij i psihologicheskoe blagopoluchie: individual'nye, mezhlichnostnye i sociokul'turnye factory. Psikhologicheskii zhurnal. 2019. V. 40. № 3. P. 31–43. (In Russian)
22. Perlz F. Praktika geshtal't-terapii. Moscow: Institut obshchegumanitarnyh issledovanij, 2005. (In Russian)
23. SHamshikova E.O. Narcissicheskie korrelyaty psihologicheskogo prostranstva lichnosti: avtoref. dis. ... kand. psihol. nauk. Novosibirsk, 2010. (In Russian)
24. SHamshikova O.A., Volohova V.I. Psihologicheskij analiz i standartizaciya zarubezhnoj metodiki “psihologicheskie granicy lichnosti” E. Hartmanna. Mir nauki, kul'tury, obrazovaniya. 2013. № 5. P. 243–248. (In Russian)
25. Uhtomskij A.A. Dominanta dushi. St. Petersburg, 1996. (In Russian)
26. Ejdemiller E.G., YUstickis V. Psihologiya i psihoterapiya sem'i. St. Petersburg: Piter, 1999. (In Russian)
27. Bradshaw J. On The Family: A New Way of Creating Soild Self-Esteem. Health Communications, Inc., 1996.
28. Brown N. The Destructive Narcissistic Pattern. Westport, CT: Praeger, 1998.
29. Federn P. Das Ichals Subjekt und Objektim Narzissmus. Internationale Zeitschriftfuer Psychoanalyse. 1929. V. 15. P. 393–425.
30. Gross J. Antecedent- and response-focused emotion regulation: Divergent consequences for experience, expression, and physiology. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1998. V. 74. P. 224–237.
31. Ickes W. Traditional gender roles: Do They make, and then break, our relationships? Journal of Social Issues. 1993. V.49. P. 71–85.
32. Levant R.F. Toward the reconstruction of masculinity. Journal of Family Psychology. 1992. V. 5 (3–4). P. 379–402.
33. Marcher L. The Ego Function Boundaries. Body Encyclopedia: A Guide to the Psychological Functions of the Muscular System. Eds. Marcher L., Fich S.Berkeley: North Atlantic Books, 2010. P. 475–481.
34. Hartmann E. Boundaries in the Mind: A New Psychology of Personality. N.Y.: BasicBooks, 1991.